[Salon] Tweet by T. Greer (@Scholar_Stage), "We have crossed a Rubicon



Long tweet, starts here...

https://twitter.com/Scholars_Stage/status/1580950956560199683?t=iJy9rYluL1M63l98yAo-Kw&s=19

I have been doing interviews & research on the question of “when would Beijing decide to pull the trigger on Taiwan, and why then?” 

The most convincing argument I encountered for “not for a very long time” was essentially “they can’t afford to be cut out of chip supply chain.

They will wait until they have finished building up a semiconductor complex that can survive being cut off from the West. They will not trade a century of technological dominance for the sake of an early war with Taiwan, unless forced into it.”

A lot of pages that were supposed to go into that piece have been overtaken by events. 

I cannot foresee what the ultimate effect of this decision will be. we’ve just crossed a threshold, the kind historians decades from now will point to as one of those points of no return.

There were a few pieces from a bit back that argued “China thinks we are in decline—and we need to show them we are not!” I always thought this was faulty logic.

A China that thinks time is on its side, that American decline is not just eventually inevitable but clearly happening *now* is a China with no incentive to take desperate measures.

Men and women die when leaders think there is no wait out but a gamble. They have died this way in their millions and millions.

We have crossed a rubicon. The reaction from the Chinese side is muted because the Congress is around the corner and they haven’t had time to develop a policy or propaganda response yet. It will come.

I don’t see a future now where the US-China relationship is not as dark as the Cold War rivalry.

Protecting Taiwan has always put as at ends with their national aspiration, the reason of being for the Party—but there was always the hope that the issue could be deferred, that a compromise solution could be found, that legal fictions could preserve the facade peace needed.

And of course there was always the possibility we would not actually defend the Taiwanese at all. Or on the reverse side, that the Chinese would never risk their achievements in other fields for the gamble of victory here.

This is different. 

Here we are not declaring our intent to probably stop the Party from achieving its historical mission, in some faraway future where they might take the worst path for doing so.

No, we are *actually* stopping the Party in its tracks, today. This isn’t hypothetical, it isn’t ambiguous, it isn’t about something they might do one day.

They have the goal to make China the leader in 21st century technology, the cutting edge of science and industry. They view this aim as both central to the historical mission of “making China great again” and to preserving the security and safety of their people.

It is at the center of all their plans and dreams—military, economic, even demographic and political, really (though it would take a separate thread to explain why).

That cross linkage is of course why we made the decision to clamp down on the first place. They were the first to fuse it all together.

So we have followed the thread back to its center and declared war on the future of China—its future military capacity, technological advance, and economic dynamism. We are now officially, openly, in the business of making sure China will not rise higher.

they will understand our move in exactly these terms.

If this must be done, better to do it sooner than later. Perhaps we are too late in doing it. But that is what we are doing. Doors were closed this week, doors that may not open again for decades.

Update: some people are using this thread to claim I think we have a war just around the corner. 

I did not write that.

 My position is this: the CPC has long seen America as a threat to its historical mission—we have now unequivocally confirmed that this is true.


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.